How the Managers Personality Affects His Management Style Essay

How the Managers Personality Affects His Management Style - Essay ExampleMoreover, his ability to monitor the internal and external environment factors ar also very beta for the organisation (Robbins, Coulter 2002).A manager is generally responsible for a project or a team of people and, essentially, must be sufficient to communicate, negotiate and influence. However, these skills can be performed in different ways. A key component of job satisfaction is the relationship between managers and their staff. This, in turn, is influenced both by the people and management styles involved (Which Management Style 2005).In their book Management, Robbins and Coulter stressed, Management is the process of organize work activities so that they argon completed efficiently and effectively with and through other people. They also said that the manager is someone who works with and through other people by coordinating their work activities in order to accomplish organisational goals (Robbins, Cou lter 2002).Generally speaking, there are four functions of the manager planning, organizing, leading, and arbitrary. Planning includes specify the goals, establishing strategies, and developing plans to coordinate activities. Organising includes defining what needs to be done, who forget do the job, and how it will be done. The leading function implies motivating and influencing subordinates, and resolving all the conflicts among them. Moreover, the last function of the manager is controlling or monitoring the activities to ensure that they have been accomplished as planned (qtd from Ghazaryan 2002). However, there is an additional liability for manager that is managing the internal culture and external environment. Managers become within the constraints imposed by the organisational culture and external environment but they are not powerless they can still influence the organisations performance (qtd. from Ghazaryan 2002). The conduct of the manager should be either an immediat e source of satisfaction or a future means of satisfaction for group members. Moreover, a leaders behaviour will motivate employees if it satisfies their needs. This satisfaction is contingent on effective performance of the leader, which includes coaching, guidance, support, and rewards that are necessary for effective performance (Robbins, Coulter 2002). Management styles are depends on behaviour, and behaviours are linked to the managers own unique personality. Management style is a term often used to describe the how of management. For a while, it was believed that there were only two grassroots management styles autocratic and democratic. An autocratic style is used to instruct and command. Managers who use this style impose their decisions on staff and expect or demand compliance. A democratic style allows decisions to emerge from a consensus (eg, a vote) (Which Management Style 2005). Sad to say, most management styles in many organisations are not corroboratory to the crea tion of high performance organizational cultures where ingenuity, creativity, and innovation can thrive, possibly because management is autocratic. In successful businesses or organisations, managers were described as accessible, approachable, consensual, entrepreneurial, empowering, motivating, innovative and trusting.